Une Première sensationnelle

S'affranchir (1913)
S’affranchir (1913)

Le Gaumont-Palace fait une brillante réouverture au milieu des applaudissements d’une foule enthousiaste.

L’événement attendu avec tant d’impatience par les habitués du splendide établissement du boulevard de Clichy, a eu lieu vendredi 5 septembre, au milieu d’une affluence des plus considérables. Dès 8 la 1/2 toutes les places étaient prises et les retardataires en furent pour leurs frais. Des centaines de personnes assiégèrent encore les guichets, mais il a fallu les renvoyer au lendemain. C’est de bon augure pour l’art cinématographique en général et le Gaumont-Palace en particulier, auquel revient incontestablement le mérite d’avoir intéressé, à la projection animée, la haute société parisienne.

Le Gaumont-Palace, qui certainement était déjà un établissement de premier ordre, s’est encore embelli et un nouveau promenoir y a été ouvert. Actuellement, on peut faire le tour de l’immense salle de spectacle et regarder, à l’aise, pendant les entr’actes, passer les milliers de personnes qui s’y donnent rendez-vous. Au point central, au-dessus de l’entrée, la magnifique rotonde; où sur des tables sont disposées les meilleures publications illustrées de France et de l’Etranger. Le grand foyer du rez-de-chaussée, qui se trouve à l’autre éxtremité des couloirs, est plus facilement accessible depuis que les deux promenoirs latéraux y conduisent, et lorsque l’orchestre tzigane y fait, entendre ses valses entraînantes, la foule y est aussi nombreuse que choisie. Or l’heureuse transformation dont il s’agit n’est pas seulement comprise dans un but esthétique, mais elle augmente de façon fort appréciable le nombre des portes de dégagement, de sorte que, même les soirs de presse exceptionnelle, l’évacuation de la salle peut se faire dans les meilleures conditions.

La décoration des foyers et promenoirs a été remise à neuf et l’œil repose agréablement sur les belles tentures parsemées de marguerites Gaumont.

Parlons maintenant du spectacle dont le succès fut, est-il besoin de le dire, des plus vifs. S’affranchir, le beau drame cinématographique, où Mme Renée Carl, dans le rôle principal, s’est fait admirer de nouveau par les délicats et les connaisseurs. Ce film met une fois de plus en grande vedette la belle artiste qui incarne, avec une vérité saisissante, le personnage émouvant de la Rosa Alba. Mme Renée Cari a pu goûter, vendredi soir, les joies du triomphe. Et ceux qui suivent passionnément l’évolution du cinématographe vers sa formule définitive, s’en réjouiront de tout cœur, car une telle interprétation a l’importance d’une démonstration claire, précise, irréfutable : elle prouve que le cinéma, quand il est interprété par des artistes de certe valeur, peut prétendre à exprimer les nuances les plus subtiles du sentiment, aborder tous les genres, et qu’il n’est pas un parent pauvre du théâtre, mais, au contraire, un frère jeune, il est vrai, mais plein de vie, débordant de sève et riche d’espoirs.

Nul ne pouvait mieux servir cette démonstration que Mme Renée Carl. Son jeu est d’une limpidité admirable, si naturel qu’il donne bien l’impression de la vie telle qu’elle est, si sobre qu’elle pourrait tenir l’écran pendant une soirée sans lasser le spectateur. Ses regards et ses attitudes ont une éloquence que n’atteignent jamais les tirades les mieux venues, parce que les tirades sont toujours fausses, et que, dans les moments où l’on est le plus ému, on n’en fait pas.

Pour citer un exemple : Dans la scène si douloureuse de S’affranchir, où la Rosa Alba quitte le foyer conjugal en suppliant son mari de ne pas dire un mot pour la retenir, quand elle ferme derrière elle la porte de la maison, il se dégage de l’attitude, des rares gestes et du visage de Mme Renée Carl, une telle expression de douleur, que la salle est empoignée par cet art si délicat, si simple, si humain…

Il est juste de dire ici que M. Navarre, qui joue le rôle. du colonel, partage avec sa belle camarade le succès de la soirée.

Mais il serait injuste de ne pas consacrer une ligne aux autres films qui, par d’autres moyens, ont captivé et retenu l’attention du spectateur, ainsi qu’aux attractions dont la variété peut être considérée comme une des spécialités du Gaumont-Palace.

L’orchestre fut comme toujours au-dessus de tout éloge et les différents morceaux ont été soulignés par de nombreux applaudissements.

M. Léon Gaumont, entouré de sa famille, assistait dans une première loge à cette sensationnelle première. Il peut être justement fier de la renommée mondiale de son splendide établissement.

(Le Courrier Cinématographique, 13 Septembre 1913)

Il Mostro di Frankenstein al cinema Modernissimo

Luciano Albertini (Sansonia)
Luciano Albertini (Sansonia)

Per un caso stranissimo gli scrittori della Albertini Film sono riusciti a metter mano su un soggetto eccellente: e con ogni probabilità hanno dovuto offendersene perché se ne sono vendicati.

Lo spunto è quanto di più cinematografico ci sia: la fabbricazione artificiale dell’uomo. Seguendo la novella inglese i soggettisti ci presentano un chimico che riesce a fabbricare un uomo, e che produce tale un mostro di ferocia e di idiozia cha ha orrore della sua fatica.

Ma nello svolgimento dello spunto gli autori hanno perduto una meravigliosa occasione per fare un film eccellente, perché non hanno tenuto nessun conto del formidabile materiale di cui disponevano, e non l’anno utilizzato che a pezzi e bocconi.

Essi avrebbero potuto fare un film paradossale e filosofico, ricco di situazioni e di colpi di scena, tale da oscurare senz’altro quel meraviglioso lavoro tedesco che è lo sciopero dei ladri. Avrebbero potuto farne anche un avvincente film d’avventure solo che in loro fosse stata un po’ più d’immaginazione e di fantasia: e avrebbero fatto cosa degnissima.

Invece, perdendo completamente il senso delle proporzioni, hanno mischiato il filosofico all’avventuroso, il sentimentale al religioso e ne è venuto fuori un’insalata russa d’incoerenze.

Il personaggio del mostro, benché interpretato eccellentemente da un attore che non è nominato, è in perenne contrasto con i titoli. Mentre la didascalia lo definisce idiota, più cosa che essere, noi vediamo la creatura spaventosa dimostrarsi provvista di sufficiente raziocinio, perché ha paura, sente il bisogno di fare quel che fanno gli altri e cioè vestirsi, e quindi comprende, obbedisce agli ordini che gli vengono da Sansonia, evade come uno che sa benissimo che cosa è una porta, e — dulcis in fundo — possiede anche delle estese cognizioni sulla lotta greco-romana! Ed è idiota un uomo simile, nato da due o tre giorni ? O che volevano i soggettisti ? Che il mostro uscisse dal lambicco di Frankstein (1) laureato in filosofia? E che dire di quell’imbecille di Frankstein che dopo aver creato un prodigio simile — un essere vivente! — non ci si appassiona e non tenta, a costo di tutto, di capirlo e farsi capire?

E se invece, senza fare nessuna considerazione filosofica, gli autori si fossero preoccupati di fare solo un film d’avventure sarebbero lo stesso riusciti nell’intento molto meglio.

In ogni modo però è tale la forza dello spunto che il film, anche così sconquassato, interessa moltissimo. Chi si indigna è l’artista che vede rovinare una chiesa per fare una sacristia.

(Kines, 10 settembre 1921)

1. Così nell’articolo originale.

Rudy Valentino’s Artistic Soul

Rudy Valentino, photograph James Abbe
Rudy Valentino, photograph James Abbe

Star Declares Productions Do Not Live Up to His Ambitions — It Is Rumored However That Salary Is Big Issue in Present Difficulties

NEW YORK, September 5. — Rodolph Valentino’s artistic soul has been jarred. The jolt, he declares, was delivered by the way “Blood and Sand” — one of the greatest box office attractions ever known on Broadway — was handled by Famous Players-Lasky Corporation.

But be it known to all and sundry, declares the young man whose pulchritudinous charms bring sighs of admiration from the lowermost depths of the hearts of feminine screen fans, box office values mean nothing to him. Money is nothing. Artistry is the thing. So there.

Not Interested in Box Office Value Says Star

Says Valentino in the only interview he has deigned to relieve himself of: “I have been dissatisfied with the photography, management and direction — the handling of all my films. They do not live up to my artistic ambitions. I am not interested in their box office value, but only from the artistic viewpoint.”

So there again. It is rumored in motion picture vehicles that the realization that his artistic temperament had been bumped came to Rodolph while he was studying arithmetic on a small slip of paper bearing the Famous Player-Lasky signature and representing his weekly emolument. With a star of lesser magnitude that little slip would be called the pay check.

The Trouble Starts

It is also rumored that the wallop to the artistic sense would have been greatly assuaged had the star been able to study higher mathematics on the emolument certificate. So taking it by and large Rodolph decided it was high time for him to trek East and start trouble. So he came and started it, and already a whole flock of attorneys are trying to unscramble what “Rudy” started.

The first flirt of the scramble was the filing of a notice by Valentino through his attorney upon Famous Players that he was dissatisfied and desired to be loosed from his contract. In other words he didn’t like the way his job was being handled and proposed to close the act.

Elek John Ludvigh, general counselor and treasurer of Famous Players, after a couple of conferences with Valentino’s attorney, in an effort to effect an amicable settlement, decided to at once bring suit against the lover of the screen to compel him to fulfill his contract. The papers being prepared in the case also seek to enjoin Valentino from working for anyone else during the period of his contract with Famous Players.

The law firm of Guggenheimer, Untermeyer and Marshall have been engaged by Mr. Ludvigh to institute the suit which will be commenced within a few days. The matter was brought to the attention of Will H. Hays by a letter from the law firm. Valentino’s attorney has also sought the intervention of Mr. Hays. The latter, however, holds that the matter is not within his province and has only taken cognizance of the affair by acknowledging the letters and forwarding them as requested.

Sends Letter to Hays

Following is the letter sent to Mr. Hays by Guggenheimer, Untermeyer and Marshall, copies of which were mailed from the Hays office to all members of the Motion Picture Producers & Distributors Association:

« We address you as president of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America, Inc. We have been retained by Famous Players-Lasky Corporation to bring suit against one Rodolph Valentino, a motion picture actor, to restrain him from violating his agreement to perform exclusively in motion pictures for the Famous Players-Lasky Corporation, for a period which, including renewal options, has about two and one-half years to run. We are ready to disclose to you the terms of the contract should you desire further information regarding it.

Pending the hearing of an application which we are preparing for an injunction pendente lite, it is important that no producer shall enter into a contract with Valentino, in ignorance of the rights and claims of our client.

In order that the facts may be brought to the attention of the industry, will you be good enough to communicate promptly with all producers and distributors who are members of your organization, acquainting them with our client’s claims in the premises? You will thereby render a distinct public service by preventing others from becoming involved in this litigation and at the same time will accord proper protection to ‘our client, who is a member of your organization, against the consequences of what we regard as a threatened breach of contract ».

Valentino Makes Appeal

The following letter was received at the Hays office from Arthur Butler Graham, attorney for Valentino:

« My attention has been called to a letter sent you today by Messrs. Guggenheimer, Untermyer and Marshall, who state that they have been retained by Famous Players-Lasky Corporation to bring suit against one Rodolph Valentino, a motion picture actor, to restrain him from violating his agreement to perform exclusively in motion pictures for Famous Players-Lasky Corporation, and requesting that you communicate promptly with all producers and distributors who are members of your organization, acquainting them with the claims of their client in the premises. You are assured by them that you will thereby render a distinct service by preventing others from becoming involved in the litigation and at the same time will afford proper protection to Famous Players-Lasky Corporation, who is a member of your organization, of the consequences of what the writers regard as a threatened breach of the contract.

Notwithstanding that you are president of the Motion Picture Producers and Disributors of America, Inc., and perhaps do not ostensibly represent the stars, directors and others who are an important part of the production of pictures, I have followed with interest and admiration your sincere efforts for the good of the motion picture industry as a whole and your growing conception of its mission and of its importance as a contribution to our times.

For the foregoing reason I feel sure that while you would be willing to heed the request of counsel for Famous Players-Lasky Corporation to afford proper protection to their client, you will also stand firmly for a proper protection for any artist sincerely devoted to his work, against violation of contract, oppression of himself or suppression of his talents.

I realize that not even the great power and far-reaching influence of Famous Players-Lasky Corporation will affect your judgment or your action, and I am writing you for the sole purpose of conveying to you Mr Valentino’s assurance of the justice of his cause and to ask you to withhold any action until the court has rendered its decision ».

(Exhibitors Herald, September 16 1922)